It was also urged that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963 and the High Court should have held that the appellants had perfected their title by way of adverse possession and even on the ground of equity no decree for possession can be passed in favour of the contesting respondents who are the successor -in-title of the original plaintiff. The third point on which the impugned judgment was assailed was that the contesting respondents (original plaintiffs) did not succeed in proving their title in respect of Survey No. 1 to 3 (contesting respondents) who are the legal representatives of the Original Plaintiffs, 10 did not prove that the disputed land falls within Survey No. The second point urged was that the respondent Nos.
STANDOFF 2 MARCH UPDATE 201O CODE
It was, therefore urged that in the absence of any pleading and prayer for relief against the Defendant No.2 (Predecessor-in-title of the Appellants), the suit is liable to be dismissed as against Defendant No.2 in view of the provisions of Order VII of Code of Civil Procedure. Attention of this Court was drawn to the original prayer in the plaint and also the prayer in the amended plaint. The first issue which was raised was that no pleading and no prayer for a decree of possession was made against Lateef Hassan Burney, Original Defendant No.2 (the Predecessor in title of the Appellants). 2) Act, 1998 as ultra vires of the Constitution of India and in particular, Article 14 of. The third point on which the impugned judgment was assailed was that the contesting respondents (original plaintiffs) did not succeed in proving their title in respect of Survey No. .March 1998 under Section 87(m)(ii)(b) of the Finance (No. 1 to 3 (contesting respondents) who are the legal representatives of the Original Plaintiffs, 10 did not prove that the disputed land falls within Survey No. Polish F-16s have received the first AGM-158 JASSM low observable standoff air-launched cruise missiles. The second point urged was that the respondent Nos. Leach had been appointed to the position of First Vice-President by the Directors of the Bank on March 2 prior to which he had been Managing Director.